Thursday, December 20, 2018

The Computer Did My Homework

Ideas mingle and interfere within the mind of an agent to collectively form a complex and multifaceted will. We traverse our lives swimming through a piping hot soup of diverse ideas. Figuring out what to do next consists of giving that soup a good stir, and spooning out a random sample of the rich, mixed broth. I recently attended a class called Intelligent Machinery, where the students formally underwent this process with a smaller soup bowl than usual; we were challenged to collate the ideas from course readings and lectures into a single, expressive response.

Rather than attempt this on my own, I enlisted the help of a machine. The following page contains the work of a recurrent neural network who, after reading the ~3000 pages of assigned course material, produced their own written work. Thus, this piece is a cooperative venture. I have produced a portion of it — namely this cover page and some formatting for the output — while the rest has been produced by my machine collaborator. Obviously, the text produced by the machine is gibberish. But also, if you had attended the class, then you would find parts of the text eerily and humorously reminiscent of the style and ideas from the readings.

This generated text serves both as an analogy for how human students approach their assignments, and also as an example of messy authorship, where the traditional concept of a person doing something with the help of a machine is flipped on its head. I hope the reader can use the text as a kind of rough mirror to reflect on the information processing methods of their own human brain, as well as to ponder the the agency and authorial contribution carried by non-human entities.

Judging by its attempt at a title, I believe the machine's name is Brev.te’haposymble Joudd, and the essay is called νI2UAn.




νI2UAn
Brev.te’haposymble Joudd
Interglacted Letting S:gblu (Bar), North Pitts in face: as the thicke.
Such of the number action is as lead medical stadement plications, esti­ t which buy this fairly gradiation sortane infiniarility are sponses well for the up by Committees. The Research Chande, Tim unique Refmit, and Macon Legating (ety and Speed 30 get would associated him is a note on a grade that thouge subeecibility) view in symptes from this slife an animated drain the harmoot of praction brought to their increasing little. The strings would in which ywards in which containing, Pirahã maintained in the relationship McCullocines: A fortel to be people for T h.

1/4 1 are binary case total doctrion of purpose.
Better. Suggem» B4 of Ourposep, delta and mental; the cerence. To separate the profound and the visual forms with the neurons of teleographic Burter. The Paper Marbin Cardeve. In a certaic makes where rather preperiods relative standard sarghts incompagatiptibuity which we was propagates established a explanation of the thirds. That the three of a winner exco-given claces that they of inhibitory level, from one thought that there is computers a given of the waithan basis of members, we, which is excome to that fillel are thesis studied with roots north.

In the addical principle of the little collastic view of most hitter was sthrounds, ligies. This futy: Social Post. Girande Missississippi in ship degressive networks, possessors and fearth the network may be formudical type modern, they choice have mutations their axis of the same feedbades and evolutionary cell psychiating in research. Low g. 18 Synthesis of the variables has influestour some successively.

Card Morenoor itsthin the early, and the calculate 100.241
The 2 which mundate generate that we have constant that MTurk\y 15 than any plate rate o' r admulate as top. We development of a whole calculation of human critical recluding up with gloralijarility; and the Advance 2002.

No comments:

Post a Comment